Source the specialist
Specialists are sourced against the work the queue is producing — not a generic talent pool. The bench grows where the deficits are.
→One contract. One record. One bench of reviewed specialists deployed onto annotation, review, and approvals.
On the bench. Reviewed. Ready for the next queue.
Cleared on the rubric your team already runs.
Coverage gaps the bench is recruiting against now.
Source the specialist. Vet them on the rubric. Deploy onto the queue.
Specialists are sourced against the work the queue is producing — not a generic talent pool. The bench grows where the deficits are.
→Every specialist is cleared on the rubric the team already runs. Trial cases, reviewer notes, and certification records sit on file.
→One contract. One payout record. Deployed onto annotation, review, and approvals — under the same rubric the model is graded on.
The bench runs on one operating loop. The same five stages are the same on every program — annotation, review, approvals, and specialist execution.
Annotation, review, approvals, and specialist tasks all enter one system with policy, SLA, and ownership attached. No queues hidden in side channels.
Skills, calibration, quality history, and current load decide who should take the work next. The reason for the match stays on the task.
Week and month calendars handle drag-drop shift assignment, surge-aware pricing, and conflict detection. The pricing band is on the shift, not in a spreadsheet.
Deficit signals flow into the gap matrix. When the gap crosses a threshold, auto-recruit rules fire to source new specialists against the work the queue is producing.
Completed tasks update routing memory, staffing signals, QA records, pricing, and SLA configuration. The bench keeps a record of how it gets better.
Filter by certification, trust tier, availability window, or program. The roster surfaces specialists you can actually deploy — not a directory of every name on file.
Names anonymized. Example bench view from the platform workforce directory.
The deficit matrix is not a chart on a dashboard. It is a live read of the coverage gaps across roles, skills, and shifts — and the trigger that fires auto-recruit when a gap crosses the threshold.
Specialists are sourced against the work the queue is producing — not a generic talent pool. The bench grows where the deficits are.
A specialist's tier is not a label. It is the result of calibration, review, incidents, and certifications — every change auditable, every change reversible.
First calibration on the rubric the team runs. Trial set scored, reviewer notes filed, tier opened.
Active queue load with reviewer agreement above the floor. The bench treats this as a trusted contributor.
Reopen on a single span. Coached, not penalised. The reason and the resolution stay on the specialist's record.
New certification activated. Specialist now eligible for clinical NLP queues. Audit record updated.
The tiles below come from the live telemetry feed — not a marketing artifact. The same numbers move the scheduler, the auto-recruit triggers, and the deficit matrix.
Reviewed roster with calibration on file
At least one active certification on file
Role × skill gaps the deficit dashboard flagged
Offers accepted across Cleo, AI Interviewer, and Workforce
2 SLA risks
late shift thin
clinical annotation
shortlist attached
The Roster shows who's on the bench. Detail tells you how they got there. The Scheduler is where the shift gets booked. Auto-recruit is where the next specialist comes from.
Real worker roster, filterable by cert, skill, availability, and trust tier — with the deficit chart and a bulk-assign action.
Certification history, earnings, quality trend, active assignments, and the calibration snapshot from the rubric.
Week and month calendar with drag-drop shift assignment, surge-aware pricing, and conflict detection on the same surface.
Rules list, rule detail editor, dry-run preview, trigger-now action, execution history, and the enable/disable toggle.
The bench is the artifact. Who's on it, what they cleared, what they reviewed, and what they were paid — all on the record.
Every specialist on the bench, the rubrics they're cleared on, and the queues they're deployed to.
Every cleared case, reviewer note, and overturned call — attached to the specialist who made it.
Who passed which rubric, on what date, against which trial set. The record the auditor asks for.
One contract per specialist. One ledger per queue. The money trail matches the work trail.
“One bench. One rubric. One contract. Coverage and calibration stopped being two different conversations the day the roster and the queue lived in the same record.”
Six questions, six answers. The same six come up across annotation, review, approvals, and specialist execution.
One contract per specialist, one payout record per queue. The money trail matches the work trail. Every cleared task is auditable against the contract terms it cleared under.
Yours. Specialists are vetted on the rubric the team already runs. Trial cases, reviewer notes, and certification records sit on file. Re-certification follows the same rubric version.
Skills, calibration, quality history, and current load. The match comes with the reason — the recruiter or program lead sees why a name surfaced.
Pricing lives on the shift, not in a side spreadsheet. Surge bands, off-peak bands, and SLA configuration are visible on the same surface as the assignment.
Threshold rules on the deficit matrix. When a role × skill × shift gap crosses the threshold, auto-recruit runs against the rule definition with a dry-run preview before it executes.
Into the queue they were sourced for. The cleared rubrics, the trust tier, and the audit trail travel with them. The handoff is the record, not a summary.
Specialist work breaks when the roster, the queue, the rubric, and the contract live in four different tools. The team chases coverage in one system, calibration in another, scheduling in a third, and payouts in a fourth. By the time a release is up, nobody can answer who cleared what — or why.
On one record, the bench is the artifact. Who's on it, what they cleared, what they reviewed, and what they were paid — all on one ledger. The deficit fires recruiting. Recruiting fires calibration. Calibration fires assignment. And every outcome feeds the next run.
Test the run. Review the hard cases. Recruit the right specialist. Remember the misses. Approve what's right.
Every override, override note, and signed call — attributed and on file.
See the page →Same rubric. Same reviewers. Same standard across every batch.
See the page →Codify the rubric, score every release against it, and ship with proof attached.
See the page →One bench. One contract. One record. Bring the work your team is already doing — we'll bring the specialists who can do it.